I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was building a lot more stress and was slower compared to the old things. I do not bear in mind if I even attempted regular h4831 or not; I am contemplating not.

H4831SC Powder accessible in stock now. Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain size, as a result, the designation SC or limited Slash. The shorter, more compact kernels allow the powder to movement throughout the powder actions additional effortlessly, assisting to ease the constant cutting of granules.

WARNING: This merchandise can expose you to steer, which is known for the Point out of California to cause most cancers and start defects or other reproductive hurt. For more information drop by – .

Using the 154 grain Hornady SP within the 280, H4831 gave me superior teams and great velocity, but Rottweil R905 has a noticeably better velocity and gives marginally much better precision. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos from the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave exceptional accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally greater. Consequently, in Each and every of these scenarios I went with One more powder, but I will surely dislike to divest myself of the H4831.

The only real big difference as I know it is that the SC was created to do the job via powder actions improved (which it does). The for a longer time grains usually do not feed nicely at all in certain measures. Thats my 02 :grin:

I realize, rough instances. H4831SC will definitely perform, I just didn't like the case density when loaded long. I do not try to remember powder demand off the highest of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which happens to be in which I ordinarily aim to get. In your situation using what you've (and what I should have finished) I might begin with the end of your bearing floor in the bullet right within the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you finally discover a velocity node.

Nampa, Idaho In my encounter the h4831sc load data only genuine distinction is that the shortcut meters better via reloading equipment. As soon as it's loaded theres no functional difference. I have listened to that the shortcut might have a tiny little bit speedier burn off h4831sc charge but it seems insignificant.

If you've got some heavier .224" bullets, you may discover a load that works OK With all the 4831. The bullets I tried that were above 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the regular 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the largest bullet that will stabilize, however it did that superbly. It's a amusing-on the lookout bullet which has a rounded nose profile, but it shoots great and kills well. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down without delay with rib-cage hits.

You could either: 1) Continue and possess the firearm(s) stated underneath routinely removed from your buying cart:

You could have to produce a handful of much more posts to receive cleared to do PM's. As soon as you reach that position I'd submit during the categorised reloading section to find out if any individual is in your area for a trade. Click to increase...

As with the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really the same/identical powder cept for grain size. Load data is interchangeable.

Like everyone reported, the SC means “brief Slash” which is a little bit much easier to meter. Can make you query why they might nevertheless make the normal a person.

Can I assume that H4831 may be substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the Bodily big difference but will it influence the burn off or velocity? I believe not but I'm not 100% certain.

The container h4831sc load data didn't possess the "Extreme" symbol on it. A coworker and I then swapped some powder, And that i ended up with another pound of H4831SC, this just one Together with the "Intense" symbol on it.